The paragraph in which Pinker is describing the twins who
were raised in extremely different environments but upon meeting were both
wearing the same blue shirts and epaulets, as well as having many peculiar
habits in common, was very interesting to me. This entire paper brings up the
issue of Nature vs Nurture, which is one of my favorite issues to try and
ponder. I personally do not believe that we are ourselves solely due to either
of these factors, however I love hearing case studies and stories of times in
which seemingly impossible or bizarre coincidences happened that seem to point
one way or another more strongly. Pinker doesn’t seem to take a strong stance
against or for Nature or Nurture, however he does bring up some excellent
points refuting Nature’s (genetic’s) role in the creation of an individual
(such as the similarities in brain maps of fraternal and identical twins,
coincidences like the blue-shirters above, etc.). The amount of reflection and
ability to see the argument from multiple perspectives is what draws me to
Pinker’s debate on this dilemma.
When evaluating this “blank slate,” I am always drawn back
to the Nature vs Nurture debate. I think that this falls into the category of
scientific reflection, no matter which side one is arguing in this debate. Both
sides are refuted with evidence, and there is a legitimate explanation
formulated from data to try and explain the reasons behind all the occurrences
that constitute “a person.” I myself, being raised in a household void of
religion, have always looked to logic and science for answers for the
unexplainable. My mind does not conform well to the idea that there may not be
a logical explanation behind something, or that something “just is.” Many of
the famous views Pinker brings into context ask you to believe them without any
scientific or logical reasoning, and these I have a hard time accepting. I am
working on being more open-minded with the ponderous and philosophical sides of
arguments, though, and reading Pinker was a good exercise with this as he presents many views on the issue.
No comments:
Post a Comment