Initially, I was
following along with much of what Dutton was saying. Many of the biological
concepts which he presents have been repetitive in much of my studies. I also
did not mind his definition of beauty, which he describes as, “…an adaptive
effect, which we extend and intensify in the creation and enjoyment of works of
art and entertainment.” For instance, I can see why he may refer to beauty as
an adaptive effect. If many of us, but not all, were to view ancient buildings
and compare them to the modern, redesigned works, we would choose the modern
ones as being more beautiful. This is because over time, we adapt to our
surroundings and the things that we grow up around.
However, during
the middle segment of his lecture and more towards the end, I started to
disagree with a lot of what he had to say. At the closing of his speech, he
states the following: “The
next time you pass by a jewelry shop window displaying a beautifully cut,
teardrop-shaped stone, don't be so sure it's your culture telling you that
sparkling jewel is beautiful." After reflecting upon this statement, I
realized that it did not agree with my views of beauty. To me, everyone has
their own individual view of what is beautiful. Therefore, it is difficult to
try to connect what science has to say about beauty, to how our eyes view it.
Additionally, Dutton uses the word “culture” in this phrase, which I do not
think is necessarily appropriate. Even individuals from the SAME culture will
have different perspectives on what they believe is beautiful.
These ideas are important to
talk about because there should not have to be a universal definition of beauty
which is assigned to certain elements in the world. Everyone should have a
voice, and part of that is being able to decide for yourself whether something
is beautiful or not.
No comments:
Post a Comment